This new, hybrid strategy may become even
more important--and more popular--as global competition increases. Compared to
companies relying on a single generic strategy, companies that integrate the
generic strategies may position themselves to improve their ability to adapt
quickly to environmental changes and learn new skills and technologies. This
would more effectively leverage core competencies across business units and
product lines and would also help produce products with differentiated features
or characteristics that customers value and provide these differentiated
products at a low cost, compared to competitors' products.
This is because of the multiple, additive
benefits of successfully pursuing the cost leadership and differentiation
strategies simultaneously. Differentiation
enables the company to charge premium prices and Cost leadership enables the company to charge the lowest competitive
price. Thus, the company is able to achieve a competitive advantage by
delivering value to customers based on both product features and low price.
Products available from companies following
an integrated cost leadership/ differentiation strategy are less differentiated
than products offered by differentiators, and costs are not as low as those of
the low-cost leader (that produces standardised products).
Figure: Integrative Cost Leadership/
Differentiation Strategies
A variety of other factors also may enable
companies to gain a competitive advantage and earn above-average returns from an
integrated cost leadership/differentiation strategy.
- Flexible Manufacturing
Systems A flexible manufacturing system is a
computer-controlled process used to produce a variety of products in moderate,
flexible quantities. It enables companies to achieve the flexibility necessary to
simultaneously respond to changes in customer needs and preferences while
maintaining the low-cost advantages of large-scale manufacturing. This increases a company's ability to
engage in an integrated low-cost/ differentiation strategy.
- Information Networks
across Companies Information networks enable a
company to co-ordinate interdependencies between internally- and externally
performed value-creating activities to increase flexibility and responsiveness.
Examples include real-time linkages between manufacturers and suppliers or
subcontractors, or between retailers and suppliers. These linkages can improve
time-to-market of new products by co-ordinating design and production
activities and reduce out-of-stock occurrences by shortening the order-restock
cycle.
- Total Quality
Management Systems These systems have been established to improve product quality
(from a customer perspective) and to improve productivity in the performance of
the internal value-creating activities. Improving product quality focuses the
attention of customers on product reliability, performance and utility, and
enables the company to differentiate its products and charge higher prices,
while lowering the costs of manufacturing and service.
Key assumptions upon which total quality
management (TQM) systems are based are as follows:
- The costs of poor quality exceed the costs of developing
processes that produce high quality products and services (in other words, it
is less costly to do things right the first time).
- Employees care about their work and will take the initiative to
improve it (but, only if the company provides the resources, tools, and
training necessary and management listens to their ideas).
- Since companies are systems of highly interdependent parts,
decision processes must be integrated and include participation from all
affected functional areas.
- Responsibility for effective TQM rests with top-level managers
who must support TQM processes and appropriately design the company so that
employees can function effectively.
The risk facing the company that chooses to
implement an integrated cost leadership/differentiation strategy is that it must
simultaneously be capable of:
- focusing on consistently reducing costs
- adding differentiated features that customers value and for
which they are willing to pay a higher price
- avoiding becoming "stuck-in-the-middle" by failing to
consistently pay attention to the competitive requirements of either or both
generic strategies
Being "stuck-in-the-middle" implies that the
company will not be able to manage successfully the five competitive forces and
will not achieve strategic competitiveness. In fact, these companies can only
earn average profits when industry structure is favourable or when other
companies in the industry also are "stuck-in-the-middle."
Type of Feature
|
Low-Cost Leadership
|
Broad Differentiation
|
Best-Cost Provider
|
Focused Low-Cost and Focused Differentiation
|
Strategic target
|
A broad
cross-section of the market.
|
A broad
cross-section of the market.
|
Value-conscious buyers.
|
A
narrow market niche where buyer needs and preferences are distinctively
different from the rest of the market.
|
Basis
of competitive advantage
|
Lower
costs than competitors.
|
An
ability to offer buyers something different from competitors.
|
Give
customers more value for the money
|
Lower
cost in serving the niche or an ability to offer niche buyers something
customised to their requirements and tastes.
|
Product
line
|
A good
basic product with few frills (acceptable quality and limited selection).
|
Many
product variations, wide selection, strong emphasis on the chosen
differentiating features.
|
Good-to-excellent attributes, several-to-many upscale features.
|
Customised to fit the specialised needs of the target segment.
|
Production emphasis
|
A
continuous search for cost reduction without sacrificing acceptable quality
and essential features.
|
Invent
ways to create value for buyers; strive for product superiority.
|
Incorporate upscale features and attributes at low cost.
|
Tailor-made for the niche.
|
Marketing emphasis
|
Try to
make a virtue out of product features that lead to low cost.
|
Build
in whatever features buyers are willing to pay for.
Charge
a premium price to cover the extra costs of differentiating features.
|
Under
price rival brands with comparable features.
|
Communicate the focuser's unique ability to satisfy the buyer's specialised
requirements.
|
Sustaining the strategy
|
Economical prices/ good value.
All
elements of strategy aim at contributing to a sustainable cost advantage – the
key is to manage costs down, year after year, in every area of the business.
|
Communicate the points of difference in credible ways.
Stress
constant improvement and use innovation to stay ahead of imitative
competitors.
Concentrate on a few key-differentiating features; tout them to create a
reputation and brand image.
|
Unique
expertise in managing costs down and product/ service calibre up
simultaneously.
|
Remain
totally dedicated to serving the niche better than other competitors; don't
blunt the company's image and efforts by entering other segments or adding
other product categories to widen market appeal.
|
Table :
Distinctive Features of the Generic Competitive Strategies