Free Online Course in International Business
Comparing Methods of Payment and Risk
The following chart offers a comparison from lowest to highest risk
to an exporter/seller and importer/buyer (permission to use image,
granted by Wm Hindon, VP, JP Morgan, 2004). The following chart
lists the methods of payment discussed in the prior section in risk
order to both the exporter (seller) and importer (buyer).
On the left side of the chart, you see the risk evaluation of the
methods of payment from the perspective of an exporter or seller.
For example, selling products or services on a “cash in advance”
basis has a low uncertainty” or “low risk” to the seller because
“cash” or funds are made available to the seller prior to the sale.
A letter of credit, next on the “level of certainty/uncertainty”
scale, is also a sound method of payment, although there could be
discrepancies in the documents that could possibly affect payment.
The same applies to the documentary collections. When “open
account,” the last item on the list, is considered as to an
exporter’s certainty/uncertainty of payment, the international
manager should understand that by agreeing to “open account”
(selling on net 30 day payment terms) there is a risk element of
when and if payment will be made. On the right side of the chart,
you can see the level of uncertainty in terms of payment made by the
importer or buyer. For example, if the importer (buyer) pays “cash
in advance” for a product or service, the “uncertainty” is that
money is paid before the product/service is available. What if there
is a quality problem or delay in receiving the product or service
which has already been paid for by the buyer? The buyer has no
recourse. At the other end of the scale, the buyer has a low level
of “uncertainty” if he/she has been “given” open account (30 days to
pay) for product or service that has been delivered. The buyer has
the product/service but has not yet paid for the invoice.
Summary
This discussion has focused on how to identify a variety of payment
methods available to a risk manager. Businesses who sell in the 21st
century global market appreciate that secured transactions are not
only way transact business when selling internationally if they want
to be both competitive and grow their business. A significant
responsibility of a credit manager is to understand the use of the
various payment terms in a competitive business environment.
However, an international manager is not the only person who needs
to learn to describe and apply the various payment methods that will
apply to buyers. Senior financial management of the seller as well
as the “business” people – marketing, operations – are well advised
to seek information as to payment decisions with buyers so that they
are able to evaluate payment terms. Payment terms are an important
component of the relationship with buyers. A pro active
international manager involves other business units and individuals,
such as those in sale management, not only in the process of “why”
certain credit terms are determined for a buyer, but also “how” they
are determined. Even though in most organizations the credit risk
group has the responsibility of establishing and determining payment
terms of customers, good business judgment in an organization should
be exercised by bringing in internal customers to the decision
process since they have stakes in the relationship with existing or
potential buyers.
Resources
US Dept of Commerce – www.export.gov MSU Globaledge Modules –
http://globaledge.msu.edu Export Financing – Receiving Payment
|